|
Post by draggon on Jan 21, 2009 11:27:04 GMT -5
So I'm not quite clear on "Primer Rods" or those showing wear, such as this. How about the style? Nothing on it newer than 69, but the stretched nose isnt exaclty 69-ish. Whatcha think?
|
|
|
Post by RodBurNeR on Jan 21, 2009 11:39:47 GMT -5
it's TRaKable, maybe not what everyone likes though. That is something to get used to here on TRaK...everyone is very honest about their replies, no sense in lying to each other right? what else do you have that fits the board?
|
|
|
Post by Koolkat on Jan 21, 2009 13:38:22 GMT -5
it's TRaKable, maybe not what everyone likes though. That is something to get used to here on TRaK...everyone is very honest about their replies, no sense in lying to each other right? what else do you have that fits the board? Well, I like it. I think it's kool. 'What everybody likes' doesn't necessarily define traditonal. The stretched frame is what makes it appear slightly contemporary. But there were similar ones back then, such as Don Tognotti's 'The Avenger' 32 coupe. His wasn't primer, but to me - primer's finer. I, for one, would like to see more of draggon's builds!
|
|
|
Post by draggon on Jan 21, 2009 21:25:21 GMT -5
Thanks for the feedback! I've got some more traditional rods coming, just have to take the pics and upload. A 32 drag roadster, Revells 34 Snap, a couple of '60's Tees, and 2 40 Fords.
|
|
|
Post by flathead51 on Jan 21, 2009 22:14:54 GMT -5
Sounds cool! If they are anything like your primer rod above, I'm gonna be watchin for them!
|
|
|
Post by fletch on Jan 23, 2009 2:36:00 GMT -5
It looks good by me. If a stretched frame is the only "issue" then we're good to go. Very nice build BTW.
|
|
|
Post by HotRodTom on Feb 3, 2009 21:29:14 GMT -5
Well? Got any more Looks great so far!!
|
|