|
Post by rbartrop on Aug 10, 2010 2:38:09 GMT -5
I wanted to run a couple of projects by you. They seem to fit the letter o the rules, but there might be some question about whether they fit the spirit. The first one is this. It falls well within the time frame, and it is recognizable as starting from a T roadster, but is it recognizable enough? The other project I want to do is to take the Frontenac heads and speed parts from this kind, and use them in the chassis from the AMT '25 T reissue, and fit it with an Ames or Mercury style speedster body to make a 1920's style 'gow job', so I guess my question on that one is, how traditional, is too traditional?
|
|
|
Post by RodBurNeR on Aug 10, 2010 3:06:07 GMT -5
I feel it totally fits here.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisV on Aug 10, 2010 5:34:42 GMT -5
Bring 'em on!
|
|
|
Post by Murphy on Aug 10, 2010 7:07:49 GMT -5
...there's no such thing as too traditional ! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Koolkat on Aug 10, 2010 11:34:48 GMT -5
I feel it totally fits here. He's da boss! Some of the LATE sixties 'show cars' are questionable.
|
|
|
Post by stingray on Aug 12, 2010 21:12:34 GMT -5
Some of the LATE sixties 'show cars' are questionable. An example! I'd like to see some!
|
|
|
Post by Koolkat on Aug 13, 2010 0:00:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rbartrop on Aug 13, 2010 0:03:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by roddratt on Aug 14, 2010 22:23:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by RodBurNeR on Aug 14, 2010 22:25:10 GMT -5
hell, that's fine and dandy! I think it's cool to look at old stuff like that. (just don't want any new builds popping up is all) Major kudos to Wes though! That's awesome to go down in history like that!
|
|
|
Post by Koolkat on Aug 14, 2010 22:53:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by paraphrenic on Aug 15, 2010 0:57:34 GMT -5
Saw that some time back on the web... Had no idea it was yours double 'K'!
It's a hell of a piece of work... And just too COOL! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Kit Karson on Aug 15, 2010 5:24:32 GMT -5
hell, that's fine and dandy! I think it's cool to look at old stuff like that. (just don't want any new builds popping up is all) Major kudos to Wes though! That's awesome to go down in history like that! Saw that some time back on the web... Had no idea it was yours double 'K'! It's a hell of a piece of work... And just too COOL! ;D Now you've gone and done it, RRR! Thanks, Bob, I truly appreciate it... especially coming from you!! Don, we've talked before about "dating" ourselves... but, in this case all is forgiven. To be remembered for a build that made it into print over 40 years ago and being loosely mentioned along with my all-time idol, Ed Roth, is truly an honor!!! Jon (PARAPHRENIC), now you know just who you're dealing with, here! There's a few of us, here on TRaK, that have seen and been a part of the history of this hobby for the better part of the last half century!! We're not "OLD", we're "EXPERIENCED"!!! As for what "IS" or "IS NOT" TRaK-able... post it and either catch the "HEAT" or reap the "KUDOS"!! Right, Guys?!. KK
|
|
|
Post by Koolkat on Aug 15, 2010 12:24:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by paraphrenic on Aug 15, 2010 12:54:27 GMT -5
Jon (PARAPHRENIC), now you know just who you're dealing with, here! Someone who's got 'OLD' and 'EXPERIENCED' mixed up?
|
|